At no point have I attempted to circumvent your decision (other might have done, but I am not responsible for their behaviour), I have just openly questioned the validity of it and suggested that you reverse it and leave the decision to censor what is IMO perfectly legal discussion to DeeZire, at which point I would take it up with him. At anyrate, perhaps continuing the public criticism of yourself was a premature decision on my part and so I have taken this discussion to private messages.
BTW, I cannot be considered by any defintion of the word a child and even if I were it would not make my argument any less valid. Don't be so ageist
Edit:
Arrgh, I've just read your comments on the 'difference' between modding and hacking and your attempts to 'interpret' the EULA in the second thread to start. Given that I can no longer post a comment there, I must say here that you really don't understand the terms at all it seems. Any modder who has analysed a part of how the game works (the .ini files, the .mix files, whatever) is a hacker by definition, DeeZire is a hacker, I'm a hacker, virtually everone on this board would fall into the classification as a hacker. We're not assembly hackers, but we are hackers none the less.