logo   login
right
Home Forums Downloads Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Forum Info
Forum Members: 18,617
Total Threads: 8,723
Posts: 95,211

Administrators:
DeeZire, Redemption

There are currently 48 users online.
Partner Links

Free Credit Repair

Learn the Ticket Broker Secrets
Advertisements


Red Alert 2 & Yuri's Revenge Editing Discuss any modding related issues to do with Red Alert 2 and Yuri's Revenge here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2003, 03:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh-HIGH-Ooh
Posts: 421
Send a message via AIM to premier89 Send a message via MSN to premier89
Default Rocking warheads

I'm having a problem with one of my warheads. It supposed to use some sort of rocking logic, but I'm getting unfavorable results with the "DirectRocker=yes" tag (i.e. Tank always flips over when targeted even if the shell detonates seven cells away or so, doesn't effect multiple units when targeting one unit). I attempted to use "Rocker=yes" logic, but it didn't get the desired affect either. I'll post the rules below:

;Meklar Cannon, 150mm
[MeklarC]
Damage=5000
ROF=300
Range=23
Projectile=CannonJetAssisted
Speed=40
Warhead=Seis
Report=GrandCannonAttack
Anim=EXPLOMED
Bright=yes
Burst=1
MinimumRange=7
Lobber=yes

; UCCR seismic warhead, can easily flip over tanks and vehicles
[Seis]
CellSpread=1.0
PercentAtMax=.5
Wall=yes
Wood=yes
;Verses=25%,25%,25%,75%,100%,100%,65%,45%,60%,60%, 100%
Verses=1%,1%,1%,3%,3%,3%,1%,1%,1%,5%,5%
Conventional=yes
InfDeath=3
AnimList=EXPLOLRG
ProneDamage=10%
;Rocker=yes
ShakeXlo=2
ShakeXhi=2
ShakeYlo=10
ShakeYhi=10
DirectRocker=yes

Any solutions?
premier89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2003, 03:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Argentina, Latin America
Posts: 166
Send a message via ICQ to JhonnyRey
Default

lol, it seems like a HUGE damage... try lowering it a bit, i mean, under 500... or reduce the cellspread of the warhead...
JhonnyRey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2003, 03:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh-HIGH-Ooh
Posts: 421
Send a message via AIM to premier89 Send a message via MSN to premier89
Default

It is a massive amount of damage, remnant of my failure with playing around with "Rocker=yes" logic, trying to see if more damage would tilt units more. However, combined with the low ROF and the horribly low verses, it is near useless against infantry (5000 * 0.01 verses (that would be 50 damage there when not prone) * 0.1 prone damage = 5 damage verses infantry when prone). The only thing that keeps it from being completely worthless against buildings is the cell spread. It can damage buildings with large foundations, but cannot harm base defenses without sufficient numbers. It can only kill vehicles in one shot, and can't effect multiple units due to the "DirectRocker=yes" tag.
premier89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2003, 11:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 334
Send a message via MSN to Xgamer
Default

The amount of rocking that happens depends on the actual amount of damage that was actually inflicted to the unit. Your warheads are set at 1% to 3% meaning that only 50 to 150 damage is applied. Set them back at 100% or so and greatly reduce the damage= value.
Xgamer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2003, 05:19 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 2,208
Send a message via ICQ to Renegade
Default

In addition, the instant flip-over is actually what DirectRocker is supposed to do...that's what it's used for! Rocker is the tag you should use, while changing your rules like Xgamer suggested.

And never forget one thing: More damage = more rocking. I.e. if the targeted tank doesn't rock hard, you just didn't hit hard - that doesn't mean the system doesn't work.
Renegade is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2003, 12:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,036
Send a message via MSN to ComradeJ
Default

And there's something in the General section about how much the directrocker does. I think.
ComradeJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2003, 03:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh-HIGH-Ooh
Posts: 421
Send a message via AIM to premier89 Send a message via MSN to premier89
Default

There is, the "DirectRockingCoefficient=" tag. However, that is for Direct Rocking, which isn't good for an artillery piece that lobs shells some 20 cells ;i.e., shell misses, yet even if the target vehicle is no where near the shell it flips over no matter what (like on the other side of the map). DirectRocker= was orginally for the brute. But if there is a DirectRockingCoefficient= tag, wouldn't there be a plain ol' RockingCoefficient= tag? Just a hunch, but if anyone confirms that before me, post here.

I used "Rocker=" with 500 damage modifying the rocking amount guys, but the vehicle blows up before it gets a chance to tip over . Even when the shell isn't htting it directly it STILL takes about 38 cannons to flip over one IFV. What is the probelm?

BTW, does anyone know where I can find a tutorial about making/recording new voice packs for units? That would be helpful.
premier89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2003, 07:15 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,036
Send a message via MSN to ComradeJ
Default

There's no RockerCoefficient AFAIK.
ComradeJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2003, 08:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 2,208
Send a message via ICQ to Renegade
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by premier89
There is, the "DirectRockingCoefficient=" tag. However, that is for Direct Rocking, which isn't good for an artillery piece that lobs shells some 20 cells ;i.e., shell misses, yet even if the target vehicle is no where near the shell it flips over no matter what (like on the other side of the map). DirectRocker= was orginally for the brute. But if there is a DirectRockingCoefficient= tag, wouldn't there be a plain ol' RockingCoefficient= tag? Just a hunch, but if anyone confirms that before me, post here.

I used "Rocker=" with 500 damage modifying the rocking amount guys, but the vehicle blows up before it gets a chance to tip over . Even when the shell isn't htting it directly it STILL takes about 38 cannons to flip over one IFV. What is the probelm?
wtf? Errm...I think you got the wrong impression of rocking...?! Rocking is not made to flip over things! DirectRocking is made for this. Rocking is only there so it doesn't look like the vehicles are totally uneffected by a cannon...
Renegade is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2003, 03:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh-HIGH-Ooh
Posts: 421
Send a message via AIM to premier89 Send a message via MSN to premier89
Default

Oh, sorry. I forgot to stress the point that the warhead was just for flipping tanks. Since Rocker doesn't cut it, is there any way to give DirectRocker a cellspread?
premier89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 different an perfectly working mutate warheads mellr0 Red Alert 2 & Yuri's Revenge Editing 43 08-10-2004 04:31 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.