logo   login
right
Home Forums Downloads Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Forum Info
Forum Members: 18,581
Total Threads: 8,669
Posts: 94,548

Administrators:
DeeZire, Redemption

There are currently 51 users online.
Partner Links

Free Credit Repair

Learn the Ticket Broker Secrets
Advertisements


Red Alert 2 & Yuri's Revenge Editing Discuss any modding related issues to do with Red Alert 2 and Yuri's Revenge here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2005, 05:06 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 367
Send a message via MSN to ChrisBlitz
Default

Professionalism is my favourite word. I would like it even more if it suited me. I think the Leecher is a good idea, and if someone wants to use one of my files, they can just ask me.
ChrisBlitz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 05:18 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 13
Default

Okay, I admit it, I love to rip.
I play with my own mod, and put stuff in, take it out, fiddle with everything. I would NEVER claim any of that stuff as my own creation. That's just wrong. That's part of why I'll never release a mod. Too much to track and document. The other reason is that I'll never finish my mod. It's in perpetual construction. That's how I play RA2.

So I'm in agreement with AG, leeching is bad, the Leecher is a personal choice, but what keeps me playing is the constant influx of new and creative units. It's a shame to lock those away so that only one person can say how to use them.

If the Leecher were around three years ago, I would have stopped playing RA2 three years ago.
HighTek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 05:26 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Default

*Talos
What are you thinking? You are the only one who looks to be a total noob in this topic? You dare to say anyone here is a noob when you have not proven anything? What professional? You don't talk like that when you're a Pro. And you're matured? Grow up noob. :drunk: :evil:
doomdoom is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 06:33 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Athens,Greece
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doomdoom";p=&quot View Post
*Talos
What are you thinking? You are the only one who looks to be a total noob in this topic? You dare to say anyone here is a noob when you have not proven anything? What professional? You don't talk like that when you're a Pro. And you're matured? Grow up noob. :drunk: :evil:
Idiot alert :lol:

Get a life my friend

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighTek";p=&quot View Post
Okay, I admit it, I love to rip.
I play with my own mod, and put stuff in, take it out, fiddle with everything. I would NEVER claim any of that stuff as my own creation. That's just wrong. That's part of why I'll never release a mod. Too much to track and document. The other reason is that I'll never finish my mod. It's in perpetual construction. That's how I play RA2.

So I'm in agreement with AG, leeching is bad, the Leecher is a personal choice, but what keeps me playing is the constant influx of new and creative units. It's a shame to lock those away so that only one person can say how to use them.

If the Leecher were around three years ago, I would have stopped playing RA2 three years ago.
And that's exactly why ripping should be allowed as long as the ripper has the maturity to use it properly,everyone of us has ripped to learn or for personnal pleasure
TaloS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 10:31 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 417
Send a message via MSN to Mr Graffitti
Default

Good one TaloS!
Mr Graffitti is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 01:40 AM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doomdoom";p=&quot View Post
*Talos
What are you thinking? You are the only one who looks to be a total noob in this topic? You dare to say anyone here is a noob when you have not proven anything? What professional? You don't talk like that when you're a Pro. And you're matured? Grow up noob. :drunk: :evil:
Flaming in your first post... Nice first impression, that you're probably never going to live down.
CannisRabidus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 02:31 AM   #27 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlliedG";p=&quot View Post
I mean modding itself is free, we would be not here, if westwood has decided to protect there files.
Your right. Westwood would never have such a crazy idea to use a two-tier blowfish encryption system so people dont get at the files? The point is the stock RA2/YR mixes are MUCH more protected than the files generated by this program.
Saberhawk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 04:29 AM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CannisRabidus";p=&quot View Post
Westwood did protect their work somewhat. The MIX format is proprietary, isn't it? They didn't just use ZIP format with a PK3 file extension like idsoftware did, did they?
they could've done what they did in startrek armada 2, and simply placed all the files in folders. so rules(MD).ini would have been located in \RA2(MD)\Local(MD)rules(MD).ini rather than RA2(MD).mix Local(MD).mix Rules(MD).ini
bobing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 05:15 AM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AlliedG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: U.K.
Posts: 726
Default

yeah the point is those u are putting unessceary additional protection onto an files which have been unlocked via Olaf, same with BIG files.

People which have been around since the beginning of CNC don't endorse it and so i wouldn't as well.

Besides in the end someone will just make a counter program to this and it will be a pointless exercise.
AlliedG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 05:20 AM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 804
Default

exactly. if all it does is change a few bytes to make i unreadable by XCC, then somone will figure out what the differences are and re-write xcc to read them, or write a protection remover.
bobing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shockwave News The_Hunter Generals & Zero Hour Editing 4 01-02-2006 08:23 PM
Shockwave News The_Hunter Generals & Zero Hour Editing 6 12-27-2005 11:03 AM
News from the Front!!! WingDingo Red Alert 2 & Yuri's Revenge Editing 15 07-25-2005 01:07 PM
Very sad news killakanz Generals & Zero Hour Editing 7 04-02-2005 07:32 AM
Breaking news!!! mad ivan Red Alert 2 & Yuri's Revenge Editing 7 02-14-2003 11:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.