[ChrisBlitz]

I hate NCO bugs.

[Death3464]

uhhh......who doesnt build those shitty defenses? You. I play france alot, but not because I turtle. I spend precious money on an mcv, send it to the enemy base, deploy it, place down a pre constructed grand cannon- then some annoying tank gets under its range? NO! I build a whole load of turrets and pillboxes.

[DCoder]

Piscinex, AliG's got a point about diversifying them. A Sentry is two-barreled, Pillbox is not. Dual barrels are fun, especially if you make the building target a different unit with each shot (DistributedFire=yes), like the Aegis does.

[Piscinex]

Originally Posted by AlliedG";p=&quot

well your spending far too much time on the subject since u have already answered it although afaik used a lazy remove NCO option.

Actually I have temporarily used the lazy option, as I have already stated.

Also if answering your question is spending too much time on a topic then I apologise; forgive me for not realising that completely ignoring your question was the better option!

You could simply have diversfy the two weapon systems instead.

That is not relevant to the project.

Your also trying to solve a problem which will rarely ever occur in an game of yr which i find equally as "useless" as your nco statement cos to be frank no one ever builds those shitty defences and if they do its early on to prevent an inf rush/

Well let's not get onto the subject of playing the game; that's something I don't believe I'd require your advice about. And Pillboxes and Sentry Guns are not "shitty": they are used far more than Prism Towers or Tesla Coils at higher levels of play because they're much faster to build and much more durable per cost.

[sutthipongp]

I have that ploblem too.I want french AI to build a lot of grand cannon
My solution is
Add Pillbox to AlliedBaseDefenses=
And add Sentry Gun to SovietBaseDefenses=
And set the owner of pillbox to allied country only do the same to sentry gun

I use this method and my French AI build 8 or more of grand cannon

[AlliedG]

defences r hardly used in yr except for the campers. 99.9% of people tank rush easy.

Also your situation is rare as you are somehow in a situation where u have any enemy construction and not your own in order to build those pill boxes or sentry guns.

I admit its unusual but DCoder himself solved the problem without NCO removal.

[Piscinex]

Originally Posted by AlliedG";p=&quot

defences r hardly used in yr except for the campers. 99.9% of people tank rush easy.

There is no such thing as a tank rush. And I can't remember a game where I haven't made a Sentry or Pillbox, in fact I doubt it's ever happened. Your point is also entirely irrelevant: by your logic all defences should be removed from the game or completely ignored.

Also your situation is rare as you are somehow in a situation where u have any enemy construction and not your own in order to build those pill boxes or sentry guns.

So because it's rare it shouldn't be dealt with?

I admit its unusual but DCoder himself solved the problem without NCO removal.

Already answered this point, so I won't do so again. I suggest you simply re-read my previous posts until you've disgested them more thoroughly .

englihs lang r ovveratd m8?

[AlliedG]

There is no such thing as a tank rush is quite possibly the most idotic comment i have ever heard.

99.9% of XWIS games r that.

[DCoder]

Bullsh*t.

[Whiteboy]

Careful AG. PiscineX is a very clever guy. He's played countless games of RA2 - he knows what he's talking about. He is probably being very smart by saying there is no such thing as a tank rush... he can be cryptic sometimes. Just wait till his next post